| 1,727 | 32 | 23 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
本文汇报了2013—2017年针对国内某高校81名工程技术类本科学生英语写作能力发展开展的一项历时研究。全程通过问卷调查、参与式观察、深入访谈、焦点访谈和周记撰写等方法收集数据。在入学之初对其教育背景、英语学习动机和高考成绩等进行了问卷调查,并通过为期16个月的大学英语读写研究型教学活动收集了学生撰写的研究周记2375篇。在使用"二语句法复杂度分析器"(L2 Syntactic Complexity Analyzer)进行量化分析后,本研究结合个人深入访谈和小组焦点访谈内容,运用动态系统理论分析和理解学生英语写作能力发展轨迹。研究结果表明,学生英语写作能力总体发展轨迹表现为不断递进,但强弱有别;个体发展轨迹呈非线性螺旋式发展,表现为持续进步型、高位稳定型和间歇发展型3种典型类型。
Abstract：This paper reports a foury e a r(2013—2017) longitudinal study on the development process of Chinese engineering students' English writing capacity. Data was collected by questionnaires, participant observation, in-depth interviews,focus group interviews and research journals. Participants were surveyed at the entrance of the university study and submitted research journals weekly for 16 months at their College English Writing Module. 2 375 journals were analysed by L2 Syntactic Complexity Analyzer(L2SCA) to understand the development process of their English writing capacity. The results were interpreted by Dynamic System Theory triangulated with data collected through in-depth interviews and focus group interviews. The findings indicate that the development process varies from student to student, but shows a spiral increase in general. Three types of individual development process were identified, in terms of Continuous Progress, High-stable Progress, and Off-and-on Progress.
[1]de Bot,K.,Lowie,W.&Verspoor,M.Adynamic systems theory approach to second language acquisition[J].Bilingualism:Language and Cognition,2007,10(1):7-21.
[2]Hansen,L.Language attrition:The fate of the start[J].Annual Review of Applied Linguistics,2001,21:60-73.
[3]Housen,A.&Kuiken,F.Complexity,accuracy,and fluency in second language acquisition[J].Applied Linguistics,2009,30(4):461-473.
[4]Larsen-Freeman,D.C h a o s/Complexity science and second language acquisition[J].Applied Linguistics,1997,18(2):141-165.
[5]Larsen-Freeman,D.The emergence of complexity,fluency,and accuracy in the oral and written production of five Chinese learners of English[J].Applied Linguistics,2006,27(4):590-619.
[6]Lu,X.Automatic analysis of syntactic complexity in second language writing[J].International Journal of Corpus Linguistics,2010,15:474-496.
[7]Lu,X.A corpus-based evaluation of syntactic complexity measures as indices of college-level ESL writers’language development[J].TESOLQuarterly,2011(3):409-420.
[8]Norris,J.M.&Ortega,L.Towards an organic approach to investing CAF in instructed SLA:The case of complexity[J].Applied linguistics,2009,30(4):555-578.
[9]Ortega,L.Syntactic complexity measures and their relationship to L2 proficiency:A research synthesis of college-level L2 writing[J].Applied Linguistics,2003,24(4):492-518.
[10]Wolfe-Quintero,K.,Inagaki,S.&Kim,H.Y.Second Language Development in Writing:Measures of Fluency,Accuracy,and Complexity[M].Honolulu:University of Hawai’i,1998.
[11]Yoon,H.&Polio,C.The linguistic development of students of English as a second language in two written genres[J].TESOL Quarterly,2016(2):275-301.
[12]方红,王克非.动态系统理论下翻译能力的构成及发展模式研究[J].解放军外国语学院学报,2014(5):124-130.
[13]侯俊霞.中外合作办学项目跨文化教学案例反思[A].李莉文,蔡鸿编.大学英语教学与跨文化能力培养研究[C].北京:外语教学与研究出版社,2017:63-76.
[14]黄莹,陈建平.大学生英语课外写作策略研究[J].外语界,2006(2):35-40.
[15]陆小飞,许琪.二语句法复杂度分析器及其在二语写作研究中的应用[J].外语教学与研究,2016(3):409-480.
[16]齐曦.生态语言学视域下的学术英语写作能力发展评估体系研究[J].外语界,2017(3):82-89.
[17]王立非,文秋芳.母语水平对二语写作的迁移:跨语言的理据与路径[J].外语教学与研究,2004(3):205-212.
[18]王娜.创新写作教学,体验数字写作--来自北京科技大学“信息技术与英语写作课程整合研究”的报告[J].中国外语,2014(2):68-73.
[19]杨莉萍,韩光.基于项目式学习模式的大学英语写作教学实证研究[J].外语界,2012(5):8-16.
基本信息:
DOI：10.13564/j.cnki.issn.1672-9382.2019.03.009
中图分类号:H319.3
引用信息:
[1]侯俊霞,陈钻钻.中国工科大学生英语写作能力发展轨迹历时研究[J].中国外语,2019,16(03):63-72.DOI:10.13564/j.cnki.issn.1672-9382.2019.03.009.
基金信息:
国家哲学社会科学基金项目“中国社会科学研究伦理审查制度缺失问题及对策研究”(15BSH032)的研究成果