nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo searchdiv qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2015, 05, v.12;No.67 57-67
元认知知识、词汇广度和二语阅读水平关系研究
基金项目(Foundation): 教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目(14YJA740018);; 湖北省教育厅人文社会科学研究项目(14Z031);; 中南财经政法大学校级教学改革研究项目(21122910205)的阶段性成果
邮箱(Email):
DOI: 10.13564/j.cnki.issn.1672-9382.2015.05.009
摘要:

本研究根据阅读成分理论,以548名中国大学二年级学生为研究对象,调查了学生的词汇广度,并探讨了元认知知识、词汇广度和二语阅读水平之间的关系。结果表明,学生词汇广度接近3 000词水平,在5 000词和学术词汇水平均表现困难。词汇广度不仅对二语阅读发生显著影响,还可调节元认知知识对二语阅读的影响。当学生的词汇量低于3 000词时,除了翻译策略,元认知知识的各维度都不对二语阅读发生显著影响。当学生的词汇量达到3 000词的阈值时,元认知知识对二语阅读的影响明显增强。个体知识中的兴趣、自我效能和学习目标都对二语阅读发生显著影响。

Abstract:

The study investigates the relationships among metacognitive knowledge,vocabulary size and EFL academic reading based on 548non-English major sophomore students in China.The findings reveal that Chinese tertiary EFL readers have a good command of 2 000-word level and approach 3 000-word level.Vocabulary size does not only exert direct influences on EFL reading comprehension ability,but also plays a significant moderating role in regulating the effect of metacognitive knowledge on EFL reading comprehension ability.When the vocabulary size reaches above the threshold of 3 000 words,metacognitive knowledge plays an increasing role in EFL reading comprehension ability.

参考文献

[1]Alderson,J.C.Assessing Reading[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2000.

[2]Alexander,P.A.,D.L.Schallert&V.C.Hare.Coming to terms:How researchers in learning and literacy talk about knowledge[J].Review of Educational Research,1991,61(3):315-343.

[3]Anderson,R.C.&P.Freebody.Vocabulary knowledge[A].In Guthrie J.T.(ed.).Comprehension and Teaching:Research Reviews[C].Newark,Del:International Reading Association,1981:77-117.

[4]Barrow,J.,Y.Nakanishi&H.Ishino.Assessing Japanese college students'vocabulary knowledge with a self-checking familiarity survey[J].System,1999,27:223-247.

[5]Bernhardt,E.Progress and procrastination in second language reading[J].Annual Review of Applied Linguistics,2005:133-150.

[6]Bernhardt,E.&M.Kamil.Interpreting relationships between L1 and L2 reading:Consolidating the linguistic threshold and the linguistic interdependence hypotheses[J].Applied Linguistics,1995,16(1):15-34.

[7]Brisbois,J.E.Connections between first-and second-language reading[J].Journal of Reading Behavior,1995,27(4):565-584.

[8]Carrell,P.Second language reading:Reading ability or language proficiency[J].Applied Linguistics,1991(12):159-179.

[9]Cummins,J.Education implications of mother tongue maintenance in minority language groups[J].The Canadian Modern Language Review,1978,34:395-416.

[10]Cummins,J.Linguistic interdependence and the educational development of bilingual children[J].Review of Educational Research,1979,49:222-251.

[11]Dweck,C.S.&Leggett,E.L.A social cognitive approach to motivation and personality[J].Psychological Review,1988,95(2):256-273.

[12]Dornyei,Z.&Ushioda,E.Teaching and Researching Motivation(2nd ed.)[M].Harlow,England:Longman,2011.

[13]Flavell,J.H.Metacognition and cognitive monitoring:A new area of cognitive developmental inquiry[J].American Psychologist,1979,34(10):906-911.

[14]Gardner,D.&M.Davies.A new academic vocabulary list[J].Applied Linguistics,2013,35(3):305-327.

[15]Goodman,K.Reading,writing,and written texts:A transactional sociopsycholinguistic view[A].In R.B.Ruddell,M.R.Ruddell&H.Singer(4th ed.).Theoretical Models and Processes of Reading[C].Newark,Delaware:International Reading Association,1994:1093-1130.

[16]Gough,P.B.One second of reading[A].In F.J.Kavanagh&G.Mattingly(eds.).Language by Ear and by Eye[C].Cambridge,Mass:MIT Press,1972:331-358.

[17]Hacker,D.J.Definitions and empirical foundations[A].In D.J.Hacker,J.Dunlosky&A.C.Graesser(eds.).Metacognition in Educational Theory and Practice[C].Mahwah,NJ:Erlbaum,1998:1-24.

[18]Hoover,W.A.&W.E.Tunmer.The components of reading[A].In J.B.Thompson,W.E.Tunmer&T.Nicholson(eds.).Reading Acquisition Process[C].Clevedon:Multilingual Matters Ltd.,1993:1-19.

[19]Hulstijn,J.H.,R.Schoonen&A.van Gelderen.Unraveling the componential structure of second-language skills[J].TESOL Quarterly,2007,41(1):186-192.

[20]Lau,K.L.&D.W.Chan.Reading strategy use and motivation among Chinese good and poor readers in Hong Kong[J].Journal of Research in Reading,2003,26(2):177-190.

[21]Laufer,B.How much lexis is necessary for reading comprehension[A].In P.J.L.Arnaud&H.Bejoint(eds.).Vocabulary and Applied Linguistics[C].London:Macmillan,1992:126-132.

[22]Laufer,B.The lexical threshold of second language reading comprehension:What it is and how it relates to L1 reading ability[A].In K.Sajavaara&C.Fairweather(eds.).Approaches to Second Language Acquisition[C].Jyvaskyla,Finland:University of Jyvaskyla,1996:55-62.

[23]Li,J.Metacognitive Knowledge,Vocabulary Size and EFL Reading Comprehension of Chinese Tertiary Students[M].Wuhan:Huazhong University of Science and Technology Press,2012.

[24]Liu,N.&P.Nation.Factors affecting guessing vocabulary in context[J].RELC Journal,1985,16:33-42.

[25]Macaro,E.Teaching and Learning a Second Language:A Review of Recent Research[M].London:Continuum,2003.

[26]Mokhtari,K.&C.A.Reichard.Assessing students'metacognitive awareness of reading strategies[J].Journal of Educational Psychology,2002,94(2):249-259.

[27]Nagy,W.&D.Townsend.Words as tools:Learning academic vocabulary as language acquisition[J].Reading Research Quarterly,2012,47:91-108.

[28]Nation,I.S.P.Teaching And Learning Vocabulary[M].Massachusetts:Newbury House,1990.

[29]Nurweni,A.&J.Read.The English vocabulary knowledge of Indonesian university students[J].English for Specific Purposes,1999,18(2):161-175.

[30]Pang,S.M.Strategy use in advanced EFL readers:Identifying and characterizing the patterns of reading strategies employed by tertiary EFL students[D].Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation.Hong Kong:Chinese University of Hong Kong,2006.

[31]Paris,S.G.&P.Winograd.How metacognition can promote academic learning and instruction[A].In B.Jones&L.Idol(eds.).Dimensions of Thinking and Cognitive Instruction[C].Hillsdale,NJ:Erlbaum,1990:15-51.

[32]Pintrich,P.R.The role of metacognitive knowledge in learning,teaching,and assessing[J].Theory into Practice,2002,41(4):219-225.

[33]Pintrich,P.R.,C.A.Wolters&G.P.Baxter.Assessing metacognition and self-regulated learning[A].In G.Schraw&J.C.Impara(eds.).Issues in The Measurement of Metacognition[C].Lincoln,NE:Buros Institute of Mental Measurements,2000.

[34]Proctor,P.,M.Carlo,D.August&C.Snow.Native Spanish-speaking children reading in English:Toward a model of comprehension[J].Journal of Educational Psychology,2005,97(2):246-256.

[35]Qian,D.D.Assessing the roles of depth and breadth of vocabulary knowledge in reading comprehension[J].The Canadian Modern Language Review,1999,56(2):282-307.

[36]Qian,D.D.Investigating the relationship between vocabulary knowledge and academic reading performance:An assessment perspective[J].Language Learning,2002,52(3):513-536.

[37]Rumelhart,D.E.Toward an interactive model of reading[A].In S.Dornic(ed.).Attention and Performance[C].New York:Academic Press,1977:573-603.

[38]Sheorey,R.&K.Mokhtari.Differences in the metacognitive awareness of reading strategies among native and non-native readers[J].System,2001,29:431-449.

[39]Schiefele,U.Topic interest,text representation,and quality of experience[J].Contemporary Educational Psychology,1996,21:3-18.

[40]Schmitt,N.,X.Jiang&W.Grabe.The percentage of words known in a text and reading comprehension[J].The Modern Language Journal,2011,95:26-43.

[41]Schoonen,R.,J.Hulstijn&B.Bossers.Metacognitive and language-specific knowledge in native and foreign language reading comprehension:An empirical study among Dutch students in grades6,8 and 10[J].Language Learning,1998,48(1):71-106.

[42]Stanovich,K.E.Toward an interactive compensatory model of individual differences in the development of reading fluency[J].Reading Research Quarterly,1980,16:32-71.

[43]Urquhart,A.H.&C.J.Weir.Reading in a Second Language:Process,Product and Practice[M].New York:Longman,1998.

[44]Vandergrift,L.The Metacognitive Awareness Listening Questionnaire(MALQ):Development and validation[J].Language Learning,2006,56(3):431-462.

[45]van Gelderen,A.,R.Schoonen,K.D.Glopper,J.Hulstijn,A.Simis,P.Snellings et al.Linguistic knowledge,processing speed,and metacognitive knowledge in first-and second-language reading comprehension:A componential analysis[J].Journal of Educational Psychology,2004,96(1):19-30.

[46]Wigfield,A.&J.T.Guthrie.Relations of children's motivation for reading to the amount and breadth of their reading[J].Journal of Educational Psychology,1997,89(3):420-432.

[47]Yamashita,J.The relationship of reading attitudes between L1 and L2:An investigation of adult EFL learners in Japan[J].TESOL Quarterly,2007,41(1):81-105.

[48]Yu,L.The role of cross-linguistic similarity in the use of motion verbs in English by Chinese and Japanese learners[D].University of Toronto,1996.

[49]Zhang,L.J.Awareness in reading:EFL students'metacognitive knowledge of reading strategies in an acquisition-poor environment[J].Language Awareness,2001,10(4):268-288.

[50]Zhang,J.L.A dynamic metacognitive systems account of Chinese university students'knowledge about EFL reading[J].TESOL Quarterly,2010,44(2):320-353.

[51]Zimmerman,B.J.&J.Risemberg.Selfregulatory dimensions of academic learning and motivation[A].In Phye(ed.).Handbook of Academic Learning:Construction of Knowledge[C].San Diego,CA:Academic Press,Inc.,1997:106-127.

[52]Zimmerman,B.J.,A.Bandura&M.MartinezPonz.Self-motivation for academic attainment:The role of self-efficacy beliefs and personal goal-setting[J].American Educational Research Journal,1992,29:663-676.

[53]李晓.词汇量、词汇深度与语言综合能力关系研究[J].外语教学与研究,2007,39(5):352-359.

[54]吕长竑.词汇量与语言综合能力、词汇深度知识之关系[J].外语教学与研究,2004,36(2):116-123.

[55]邵华.普通高师院校学生大学英语四级阶段词汇水平实证研究[J].外语教学与研究,2002,34(6):421-425.

[56]周大军,文渤燕.理工科学生英语词汇量状况全程调查[J].外语教学与研究,2000,32(5):356-361.

[57]朱东华,金利民.破解中外学术交流的困境——从《现代大学英语》精读教材看增加学术词汇的必要性[J].中华文化论坛,2012(5):184-187.

基本信息:

DOI:10.13564/j.cnki.issn.1672-9382.2015.05.009

中图分类号:H319

引用信息:

[1]李洁.元认知知识、词汇广度和二语阅读水平关系研究[J].中国外语,2015,12(05):57-67.DOI:10.13564/j.cnki.issn.1672-9382.2015.05.009.

基金信息:

教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目(14YJA740018);; 湖北省教育厅人文社会科学研究项目(14Z031);; 中南财经政法大学校级教学改革研究项目(21122910205)的阶段性成果

检 索 高级检索

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文