| 1,773 | 20 | 37 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
语言不仅是交际的工具,而且是文化的容器。语言关系到国家机器运行的软件安全。本文从都德的小说《最后一课》出发,以阿尔萨斯数百年的语言与国家的曲折历史为引,探讨了语言、文化、国家、安全、教育、濒危语言、语言纯洁化、国际性语言等概念之间的关系。文章认为,教育是推进语言治理和塑造国家意识的重要手段。语言治理需要根据社会的变化合理调整人、语言和国家之间的关系,平衡语言的工具价值与内在价值的关系,防范和抵制不良文化的影响,逐步增强国家语言文化的整体实力和竞争力。
Abstract：Language is not only a tool of communication, but also a container of culture. Language is related to the software security of nation/state machine. Starting from Daudet's short story “The last lesson”, based on the tortuous history of Alsace's languages and nations for hundreds of years, this article discusses the relationship among language, culture, nation, security, education, endangered language, language purism, international language and so on. The article argues that education is an important means of language governance and the formation of national identity and spirit. Language governance needs to rationally adjust the relationship between people, language, and nation according to social changes, balance language tool value and intrinsic value, prevent and resist the influence of bad culture, and gradually enhance the overall strength and competitiveness of the national language and culture.
[1]Ager,D.Motivation in Language Planning and Language Policy[M].Clevedon:Multilingual Matters,2001.
[2]Austin,P.K.&J.Sallabank.Introduction[A].In P.K.Austin&J.Sallabank(eds).The Cambridge Handbook of Endangered Languages[C].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2011:1-24.
[3]Calvet,L.Towards an Ecology of World Languages[M].Cambridge:Polity Press,2006.
[4]Corsetti,R.&O.Buller.Kio ni estas kaj kion ni celas:Komentoj pri la Manifesto de la movado por la internacia lingvo Esperanto[M].Rotterdam:Universala Esperanto-Asocio,1999.
[5]Craig,J.E.Scholarship and Nation Building:The Universities of Strasbourg and Alsatian Society,1870-1939[M].Chicago:University of Chicago Press,1984.
[6]Fischer,C.J.Alsace to the Alsatians?Visions and Divisions of Alsatian Regionalism,1870-1939[M].New York:Berghahn Books,2010.
[7]Harp,S.L.Building the German nation:Primary schooling in Alsace-Lorraine,1870-1918[J].Paedagogica Historica,1996(sup1):197-219.
[8]Hartweg,F.Sprachenpolitik im Elsa?:Die“Germanisierung”einer weitgehend deutschsprachigen Provinz[A].In R.Wimmer(ed).Das 19.Jahrhundert:Sprachgeschichtliche Wurzeln des heutigen Deutsch[C].Berlin:Walter de Gruyter,1991:136-163.
[9]Krauss,M.The world’s languages in crisis[J].Language,1992(1):4-10.
[10]Lazer,S.A.State Formation in Early Modern Alsace,1648-1789[M].Rochester,NY:University of Rochester Press,2019.
[11]Liu,H.Neutrality of international languages[J].Journal of Universal Language,2006(2):37-64.
[12]Mufwene,S.S.Language birth and death[J].Annual Review of Anthropology,2004,33:201-222.
[13]Pagel,M.The history,rate,and pattern of world linguistic evolution[A].In C.Knight,M.StuddertKennedy&J.Hurford (eds).The Evolutionary Emergence of Language:Social Function and the Origins of Linguistic Form[C].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2000:391-416.
[14]Putnam,R.Alsace and Lorraine,from C?sar to Kaiser,58 B.C.-1871 A.D.[M].New York&London:G.P.Putnam’s Sons,1915.
[15]Rothkopf,D.In praise of cultural imperialism?[J].Foreign Policy,1997,107:38-53.
[16]Skutnabb-Kangas,T.Linguistic Genocide in Education-or Worldwide Diversity and Human Rights?[M].Mahwah,N.J.:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,2000.
[17]Sowell,T.Conquests and Cultures:An International History[M].New York:Basic Books,1998.
[18]Szulmajster-Celnikier,A.La politique de la langue en France[J].La Linguistique,1996(2):35-63.
[19]Vassberg,L.M.Alsatian Acts of Identity:Language Use and Language Attitudes in Alsace[M].Clevedon:Multilingual Matters,1993.
[20]Weber,G.Top languages:The world’s 10 most influential languages[J].Language Today,1997(2):12-18.
[21]Weckmann,A.Brève Histoire Linguistique de l’Alsace (3rd ed)[M].Strasbourg:CNDP-CRDP Académie de Strasbourg,2011.
[22]石剛.日本の植民地言語政策研究[M].东京:明石書店,2005.
[23]本书编写组.国家安全知识百问[M].北京:人民出版社,2020.
[24]蔡永良.语言·教育·同化:美国印第安语言政策研究[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2003.
[25]胡惠林,胡霁荣.国家文化安全治理[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2020.
[26]刘海涛.欧洲联盟语言状况及语言政策[A].“中国语言生活状况报告”课题组编.中国语言生活状况报告(2005)[C].北京:商务印书馆,2006:374-389.
[27]刘海涛.语言规划的动机分析[J].北华大学学报(社会科学版),2007(4):63-68.
[28]刘海涛,王亚蓝.国际语基本特征的衡量指标探索[J].语言文字应用,2021(2):28-42.
[29]刘跃进.国家安全学[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2004.
[30]潘一禾.文化安全[M].杭州:浙江大学出版社,2007.
[31]沈骑.全球治理视域下的中国语言安全规划[J].语言文字应用,2020(2):18-26.
[32]愈之.国际语的理想与现实[J].东方杂志,1922(15):77-82.
[33]赵世举.语言与国家[C].北京:商务印书馆,2015.
[34]中国现代国际关系研究院.文化与国家安全[C].北京:时事出版社,2021.
(1)http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2015-07/01/content_2893902.htm.访问日期：2021-08-21.本节有关《中华人民共和国国家安全法》的内容均引自此网站。
(2)http://www.olcalsace.org/fr/observer-et-veiller/le-dialecte-en-chifres.访问日期：2021-08-21.
(3)https://www.ethnologue.com/.访问日期：2021-08-21.若无特别说明，本节数据均引自此网站。对于语言的定义，人们尚未达成一致的意见，因此，笔者引用该网站的数据只是为了说明有关世界语言的整体分布情况，并不意味着笔者完全同意他们对于语言的定义与分类。
(4)http://impofthediverse.blogspot.com/2014/12/a-dark-day-for-esperanto.html.访问日期：2021-08-21.
基本信息:
DOI：
中图分类号:D922.14;H0-05
引用信息:
[1]刘海涛.国家安全视域下的语言问题[J].中国外语,2021,18(06):1+10-16.
基金信息: