| 527 | 0 | 158 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
本文认为，修辞学的社会性和公共性学科本质使其成为传播与构建人类命运共同体认同的重要话语路径，但学界对这一路径的探讨还较为有限。本文首先从学科属性和研究目标两个方面出发，论证在修辞学视阈下探索人类命运共同体认同建构机制的理据，然后论述恰切地调用修辞资源以争取国家内部和外部对中国国家身份的认同是人类命运共同体理念获得认同的基础和保障，最后提出要获得全世界对这一理念的认同，需要加强国家修辞和跨文化沟通研究，从而推动人类命运共同体理念在全世界的传播与认同，让中国智慧为世界和平与发展贡献力量。本研究为人类命运共同体理念的传播与认同建构提供了启示。
Abstract：This study believes that the social and public nature of rhetoric as a discipline makes it an important discourse approach for the communication and identification of the concept of “a community of shared future for mankind”, but the discussion of this approach in the academia is still relatively limited. Therefore, this paper first analyzes the reason for exploring the mechanism of constructing the identification of the concept of “a community of shared future for mankind” from a rhetoric perspective in terms of its disciplinary attributes and research objectives. Then it discusses that appropriately employing rhetorical resources to gain recognition of China's national identity internally and externally is the foundation and guarantee for the identification of the concept. Finally, it proposes that to gain recognition from the whole globe including from the country itself, it is necessary to strengthen research on national rhetoric and cross-cultural communication, so as to promote the dissemination and identification, thus to contribute China's wisdom to world peace and development. This study may provide inspiration for the communication and recognition of the concept of “a community of shared future for mankind”.
[1] Aristotle. The Art of Rhetoric[M]. London:Penguin Books, 1991.
[2] Burke, K. A Rhetoric of Motives[M]. Berkeley&Los Angeles:University of California Press,1969.
[3] Do, T. T. China’s rise and the “Chinese dream”in international relations theory[J]. Global Change, Peace&Society, 2015(1):21-38.
[4] Ferdinand, P. Westward ho-the China Dream and “One Belt, One Road”:Chinese foreign policy under Xi Jinping[J]. International Affairs,2016(4):941-957.
[5] Gippner, O. Antipiracy and unusual coalitions in the Indian Ocean Region:China’s changing role and confidence building with India[J]. Journal of Current Chinese Affairs, 2016(3):107-137.
[6] Guluzian, C. R. Making inroads:China’s new Silk Road Initiative[J]. Cato Journal, 2017(1):135-147.
[7] Horesh, N. Toward Well-Oiled Relations?:China’s Presence in the Middle East Following the Arab Spring[C]. Basingstoke, Hampshire:Palgrave Macmillan, 2016.
[8] Malle, S. Russia and China in the 21st Century:Moving towards cooperative behavior[J].Journal of Eurasian Studies, 2017(8):136-150.
[9] Reiterer, M. Does the EU matter in the “Asian”century?[J]. Kobe Law Journal, 2016(4):151-172.
[10] Wu, S., B. Hu&Q. Pan. The impact of the US interest rate hike on emerging market economies and the Belt and Road Initiative[J]. China&World Economy, 2019(3):126-142.
[11] Zhao, S. American reflections on the engagement with China and responses to President Xi’s new model of major power relations[J]. Journal of Contemporary China,2017(106):489-503.
[12]布鲁梅特.人类命运共同体的修辞学基础是什么?[J].邓志勇等译.当代修辞学, 2020(6):1-5.
[13]陈望道.修辞学发凡（上、下）[M].上海:大江书铺, 1932.
[14]丁云亮.媒介化时代国家认同的修辞建构[J].学术界, 2018(4):110-120.
[15]胡范铸.理论与现象:当代修辞学研究的五十个问题（上）[J].当代修辞学, 2016(2):1-11.
[16]胡范铸.国家和机构形象修辞学[M].上海:学林出版社, 2017.
[17]胡曙中.美国新修辞学研究[M].上海:上海外语教育出版社, 1999.
[18]鞠玉梅.社会认知修辞学:理论与实践[M].北京:外语教学与研究出版社, 2011.
[19]李崇富.马克思主义国家观和国家认同问题[J].中国社会科学, 2013(9):5-15.
[20]刘同舫.构建人类命运共同体对历史唯物主义的原创性贡献[J].中国社会科学, 2018(7):4-21.
[21]刘亚猛.追求象征的力量:关于西方修辞思想的思考[M].北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店, 2004.
[22]梅朝阳,孙元涛.中国话语“人类命运共同体”国际传播的媒介生态思考[J].浙江社会科学, 2020(9):78-87.
[23]秦亚青,魏玲.新型全球治理观与“一带一路”合作实践[J].外交评论, 2018(2):1-14.
[24]谭学纯,朱玲.广义修辞学[M].合肥:安徽教育出版社, 2008.
[25]田鹏颖.历史唯物主义与“人类命运共同体”[J].马克思主义研究, 2018(1):119-127.
[26]王帆,凌胜利.人类命运共同体——全球治理的中国方案[M].长沙:湖南人民出版社, 2017.
[27]王锡苓,谢诗琦.新时代“人类命运共同体”理念传播评价体系的构建[J].现代传播,2020(7):39-45.
[28]王雪瑜,王建.“人类命运共同体”全球治理理念的话语建构[J].华侨大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2020(4):5-15.
[29]温科学. 20世纪西方修辞学理论研究[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社, 2006.
[30]文秋芳.拟人隐喻“人类命运共同体”的概念、人际和语篇功能——评析习近平第70届联合国大会一般性辩论中的演讲[J].外语学刊, 2017(3):1-6.
[31]吴增礼.“全球风险社会”治理的中国智慧与构想:走向人类命运共同体[J].南京社会科学,2018(8):9-14.
[32]吴志成,吴宇.人类命运共同体思想论析[J].世界经济与政治, 2018(3):4-33.
[33]袁祖社.“共享发展”的理念、实践与人类命运共同体的价值建构[J].南京社会科学,2017(12):46-53.
[34]张弓.现代汉语修辞学[M].天津:天津人民出版社, 1963.
基本信息:
DOI：10.13564/j.cnki.issn.1672-9382.2024.03.002
中图分类号:H05
引用信息:
[1]鞠玉梅.“人类命运共同体”认同建构的修辞学路径探索[J].中国外语,2024,21(03):4-10.DOI:10.13564/j.cnki.issn.1672-9382.2024.03.002.
基金信息:
国家社科基金项目“‘一带一路’背景下科技新闻话语的建构修辞及其传播研究”（编号：22BYY071）的阶段性成果