| 1,129 | 26 | 6 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
本研究以65名英语专业本科一年级学生为研究对象,考察不同任务组织方式对在线写作任务准备和产出的影响。研究将受试按照小组和独立准备两种任务组织方式分组,采取问卷调查和半结构化访谈的方式考察不同任务组织方式中学生写作准备行为的特征,通过测量学生作文的复杂度、准确度和流利度,对比分析不同任务组织方式对写作产出的影响。研究结果表明,在不同任务组织方式中,学生的准备时间、准备形式和准备内容存在差异;方差分析结果显示,不同任务组织方式对流利度没有显著影响,但小组准备中写作产出的句法、词汇复杂度和准确度有显著提高。
Abstract：This study examines the effects of participatory structures on students' task planning features and writing production in online EFL writing by measuring complexity, accuracy and fluency(CAF). 65 English-major students as subjects were divided into two groups:(1) planning in small groups and(2) planning individually. A questionnaire and a semi-structured interview were used to explore the characteristics of students' planning behaviors in the two different groups, and the measurement of CAF was used for contrasting the effects on writing production. Results show that the planning features are distinctive in the two participatory structures. While the participatory structures are not found to have any statistically significant effect on writing fluency, planning in small groups has significant benefits for students' writing production, as shown in increased syntax complexity, lexical complexity, and accuracy.
[1]Abrams,Z.I.,&D.R.Byrd.The effects of pretask planning on L2 writing:Mind-mapping and chronological sequencing in a 1st-year German class[J].System,2016,63(1):1-12.
[2]Ai,H.&X.Lu.A corpus-based comparison of syntactic complexity in NNS and NS university students’writing[A].In Ana Díaz-Negrillo,Nicolas Ballier&Paul Thompson(eds).Automatic Treatment and Analysis of Learner Corpus Data[C].Amsterdam&Philadelphia:John Benjamins,2013:249-264.
[3]Byrnes,H.&R.M.Manchón.Task-Based Language Learning:Insights from and for L2Writing[C].Amsterdam:John Benjamins,2014.
[4]Ellis,R.Task-based Language Learning and Teaching[M].Oxford:Oxford University Press,2003.
[5]Ellis,R.Planning and task-based performance:theory and research[A].In R.Ellis(ed).Planning and Task Performance in a Second Language[C].Amsterdam:John Benjamins,2005:3-34.
[6]Geng,X.&G.Ferguson.Strategic planning in task-based language teaching:The effects of participatory structure and task type[J].System,2013(41):982-993.
[7]Kellogg,R.T.Effectiveness of pre-writing strategies as a function of task demands[J].The American Journal of Psychology,1990,103(30):327-342.
[8]Lu,X.A corpus-based evaluation of syntactic complexity measures as indices of college-level ESL writers’language development[J].TESOLQuarterly,2011,45(1):36-62.
[9]Lu,X.Automatic analysis of syntactic complexity in second language writing[J].International Journal of Corpus Linguistics,2010,15(4):474-496.
[10]Lu,X.&H.Ai.Syntactic complexity in college-level English writing:Differences among writers with diverse L1 backgrounds[J].Journal of Second Language Writing,2015(29):16-27.
[11]Ghavamnia,M.et al.The effect of pre-task and on-line planning conditions on complexity,accuracy and fluency on EFL written production[J].Porta Languarum,2013(20):31-43.
[12]Ojima,M.Concept mapping as pre-task planning:A case study of three Japanese ESLwriters[J].System,2006(34):566-585.
[13]Ong.J.&L.J.Zhang.Effects of task complexity fluency and lexical complexity in EFL students’argumentative writing[J].Journal of Second Writing,2010(19):219-233.
[14]Ong,J.&L.J.Zhang.Effects of the manipulation of cognitive processes on EFLwriters’text quality[J].TESOL Quarterly,2013(47):375-398.
[15]Oxford,R.L.Language Learning Strategies:What Every Teacher Should Know[M].Boston:Heinle&Heinle,1990.
[16]Robinson,P.The cognition hypothesis,task design,and adult take-based language learning[J].Second Language Studies,2003,21(2):44-105.
[17]Rogers,J.Adults Learning[M].Milton Keynss,UK:Open University Press,1989.
[18]Sangarun,J.The effects of focusing on meaning and form in strategic planning[A].In Ellis,R.(ed).Planning and Task Performance in a Second Language[C].Philadelphia:John Benjamins,2005.
[19]Shi,L.Effects of pre-writing discussions on adult ESL compositions[J].Journal of Second Language Writing,1998,7(3):3I9-345.
[20]Skehan,P.&P.Foster.The influence of task structure and processing conditions on narrative retellings[J].Language Learning,1999(49):93-120.
[21]Skehan,P.&P.Foster.Complexity,accuracy,fluency and lexis in task-based performance:Ameta-analysis of the ealing research[A].In Van D.,P.et al.(eds).Complexity,Accuracy,and Fluency in Second Language Use,Learning,and Teaching[C].Brussels:University of Brussels Press,2007:207-226.
[22]Yuan,F.&R.Ellis The effects of pretask planning and on-line planning on fluency,complexity,and accuracy in L2 monologic oral production[J].Applied Linguistics,2003(24):1-27.
[23]Zhang,L.J.Second language writing as and for second language learning[J].Journal of Second Language Writing,2013,22(4):446-447.
[24]邓秋萍.外语教学之分组活动研究述评[J].外语与外语教学,2005(12):20-22.
[25]寇金南.我国大学英语课堂不同小组互动模式的特征研究[J].外语与外语教学,2016(1):24-32+146.
[26]刘兵,王奕凯,L.J.Zhang.在线英语写作中任务类型对任务准备和写作产出的影响[J].现代外语,2017(1):102-113+147.
[27]马蓉,秦晓晴.二语写作流利性研究趋势[J].现代外语,2013(3):315-322+331.
[28]桑紫林.合作产出对英语学习者书面语准确性发展的影响研究[J].外语与外语教学,2017(4):7-15+146.
[29]徐锦芬，曹忠凯.不同结对模式对大学英语课堂生生互动影响的实证研究[J].中国外语,2012(5):67-77.
[30]徐锦芬,聂睿.我国重点院校新生英语能力综合调查与分析--以2014级新生为例[J].外语界,2016(1):18-26.
[31]杨丽芳.移动学习在大学英语词汇学习中的应用[J].外语电化教学,2012(4):54-58.
[32]余盛明.小组讨论和独立思考对中国学生英语写作的影响[J].外语界,2008(4):48-56.
[33]曾祥敏.英语专业学生限时作文与平时作文句法复杂性之比较[J].解放军外国语学院学报,2011(5):69-74+128.
[34]张新玲,周燕.不同任务类型对中国高低水平组EFL学习者写作过程的影响[J].解放军外国语学院学报,2016(1):87-95+158-159.
基本信息:
DOI：10.13564/j.cnki.issn.1672-9382.2019.06.010
中图分类号:H319.3
引用信息:
[1]刘兵,尉潇.任务组织方式对在线英语写作任务准备和产出的影响[J].中国外语,2019,16(06):67-74.DOI:10.13564/j.cnki.issn.1672-9382.2019.06.010.
基金信息:
2017年国家社科基金项目“信息化时代基于移动学习的大学英语教学模式有效性研究”(编号：17BYY105)的部分研究成果