| 1,110 | 11 | 13 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
本文是对VerenaHaser(2005)《隐喻、转喻和体验哲学:挑战认知语义学》一书的书评。该书指出Lakoff的认知语义学存在着大量的自相矛盾和论证过程中的循环推理,对认知语义学的理论框架提出了质疑,认为它最大的缺陷在于其概念的模糊性。本文从隐喻和转喻的区分标准、Lakoff的论证方法、与体验哲学对立的"客观主义神话"和如何解释隐喻映射等方面进行述评。
Abstract：The paper attempts to review Verena Haser' book Metaphor, Metonymy and Experientialist Philosophy: Challenging Cognitive Semantics (2005). The book points out that Lakoff's cognitive semantics has many contradictions and circular reasoning, and tries to reconsider its theoretical framework, believing that its pitfall lies in the vagueness of its concepts. The paper reviews the main points of this book in terms of the distinction between metaphor and metonymy, reasoning method, embodied philosophy and metaphorical mappings.
[1]Davidson,D.What metaphors mean[C].In Davidson,Donald.Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation.Oxford:Clarendon Press,1984.
[2]Glucksberg,S.&B.Keysar.Understanding metaphorical comparison:Beyond similarity.Psychological Review,1990(97):3-18.
[3]Goodman,N.Languages of Art[M].Indianapolis:Bobbs-Merrill,1968.
[4]Goodman,N.Ways of Worldmaking[M].Indianapolis:Hackett,1978.
[5]Haser,V.Metaphor,Metonymy and Experientialist Philosophy:Challenging Cognitive Semantics[M].Berlin:Mouton de Gruyter,2005.
[6]Johnson,M.&G.Lakoff.Why cognitive linguistics requires embodied realism[J].Cognitive Linguistics,2002:245-263.
[7]Lakoff,G.The contemporary theory of metaphor[C].In A.Ortony(ed).Metaphor and Thought(2nd Edition).Cambridge:CUP,1993.
[8]Lakoff,G.&M.Johnson.Metaphors We Live By[M].Chicago:The University of Chicago Press,1980.
[9]Lakoff,G.&M.Johnson.Philosophy in the Flesh[M].New York:Basic Books,1999.
[10]Lakoff,G.Women,Fire and Dangerous Things[M].Chicago:The University of Chicago Press,1987.
[11]McGlone,M.S.Concepts as metaphors[C].In S.Glucksberg.Understanding Figurative Language:From Metaphors to Idioms[M].Oxford:OUP,2001.
[12]Murphy,G.L.On metaphorical representation[J].Cognition,1996:173-204.
[13]Putnam,H.Reference and understanding[C].In Hilary Putnam.Meaning and the Moral Sciences.London:Routledge,1978.
[14]Rakova,M.The philosophy of embodied realism:A high price to pay?[J].Cognitive Linguistics,2002(13):215-224.
基本信息:
DOI：
中图分类号:H030
引用信息:
[1]张辉,程浩.对George Lakoff“神话”的挑战——Metaphor, Metonymy and Experientialist Philosophy: Challenging Cognitive Semantics(2005)评介[J].中国外语,2008,No.22(02):103-107.
基金信息:
国家社科基金“汉语熟语理解的神经机制研究”(06BYY019)的资助