| 778 | 0 | 189 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
法律英语教材中的法律职业共同体是想象的、期望中的共同体，能为学习者未来的职业身份认同提供更多可能性。教材对法律职业身份清晰、全面的呈现有利于学习者的职业社会化。本文基于合法化语码理论，围绕职业身份建构提出法律英语教材评价的理论框架，运用合法化语码理论中专门性原则的认知关系和社会关系两个维度，评估法律英语教材中理想知者的呈现，创新性地提出评估内容应包含知识内容与知者内容两个部分。该评估框架的提出对法律英语教材的选择和编写具有实际参考价值，还可拓展合法化语码理论的应用范围。
Abstract：The legal professional community in legal English textbooks is the imagined and expected community that can provide more possibilities for learners' future professional identity. The clear and comprehensive presentation of legal professional identity in textbooks is conducive to learners' professional socialization. This paper proposes a theoretical framework for the evaluation of legal English textbooks based on the Legitimation Code Theory around the construction of professional identity,uses the epistemic relations and social relations of the specialization principle in the Legitimation Code Theory to evaluate the presentation of the ideal knowers in legal English textbooks, and innovatively proposes that the evaluation content should consist of two parts:the knowledge content and the knower content. The proposed evaluation framework has practical reference value for the selection and development of legal English textbooks, and it can also expand the application scope of Legitimation Code Theory.
[1]Alemi,M.,A.Ensafi&A.Rezanejad.Global business textbook evaluation:Task types in the spotlight[J].Iartem E-Journal,2021(13):1-20.
[2]Anderson,B.Imagined Communities:Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism[M].London:Verso,1983.
[3]Austin,J.L.How to Do Things with Words[M].Oxford:OCP,1962.
[4]Bernstein,B.Pedagogy,Symbolic Control,and Identity:Theory,Research,Critique[M].Washington DC:Rowman&Littlefield,2000.
[5]Bhatia,V. Worlds of Written Discourse[M].London:Bloomsbury Academic,2014.
[6]Cruess,R.L.,S.R.Cruess,J.D.Boudreau,et al.Reframing medical education to support professional ide ntity formation[J].A cademic Medicine,2014,89:1446-1451.
[7]Ellis,R.Understanding Second Language Acquisition(2nd ed)[M].New York:Oxford University Press,2015.
[8]Jackson,D.Re-conceptualising graduate employability:The importance of pre-professional identity[J].Higher Education Research and Development,2016,35:925-939.
[9]Kanno,Y.&B.Norton.Imagined communities and educational po ssibilitie s:Introduction[J].Journal of Language,Identity,and Education,2003(2):241-249.
[10]Karimnia,A.&F.M.Jafari.Critical ESP textbook evaluation:The case of visual arts textbook[J].Sustainable Multilingualism,2017(11):219-236.
[11]Lamont,A.&K.Maton.Choosing music:Exploratory studies into the low uptake of music GCSE[J].British Journal of Music Education,2008,25:267-282.
[12]Luckett,K.Disciplinarity in question:Comparing knowledge and knower codes in sociology[J].Research Papers in Education,2012,27:19-40.
[13]Maton,K.Knowledge-knower structures in intellectual and educational fields[A].InF.Christie&J.R.Martin(eds).Language,Knowledge and Pedagogy:Functional Linguistic and Sociological Perspectives[C].London:Continuum,2007.
[14]Maton,K.Knowledge and Knowers:Towards a Realist Sociology of Elucation[M].London:Routledge,2014.
[15]McDonough,J.,C.Shaw&H.Masuhara.Materials and Methods in ELT:A Teacher's Guide[M].New Jersey:John Wiley&Sons,2013.
[16]Moroz,N.ESP task-based coursebook development for border guards training[J].Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatle Multidimensionala.2020(12):66-85.
[17]Norton,B.Social identity,investment,and language learning[J].TESOL Quarterly,1995(1):9-31.
[18]Norton,B.&C.McKinney.An identity approach to second language acquisition[A].In D.Atkinson(ed).Alternative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition[C].Oxford:Taylor&Francis,2011.
[19]Salehi,H.,Z.Khadivar&M.Mehrabi.Evaluation of an ESP medical textbook:Instructors and learners'perceptions in focus[J].International Education Studies,2015(8):97-107.
[20]Sheldon,L.E.Evaluating ELT textbooks and materials[J].ELT Journal,1988,42:237-246.
[21]Takrousta,M.,P.Behrouzi&S.Kolahi.Evaluating an ESP textbook:A case study of English for banking purposes at EDBI[J].Revista Tempos e Espacos Educa??o,2020,32:1-16.
[22]Tomlinson,B.Materials development for language learning and teaching[J].Language Teaching,2012,45:143-179.
[23]Trede,F.,R.Macklin&D.Bridges.Professional identity development:A review of the higher education literature[J].Studies in Higher Education,2012,37:365-384.
[24]Umar,A.M.A.T.&A.A.Aneen.Evaluation of an E.S.P.textbook from teachers'and students'points of view:A case study of nursing one for premedical students at a Saudi university[J].Arab World English Journal,2022,13:157-176.
[25]Wenger,E.Communities ofPractice:Learning,Meaning,and Identity[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1998.
[26]Wolff,K.&F.Hoffman.Knowledge and knowers'in engineering assessment[J].Critical Studies in Teaching and Learning,2014(2):74-95.
[27]陈颖芳,马晓雷.构建以核心素养为中心的大学英语知识体系——基于合法化语码理论的视角[J].外语界,2018(3):38-45.
[28]付悠悠,袁传有.合法化语码理论视域下法律英语教材语义密度研究[J].外国语言文学,2023(2):28-39.
[29]龚亚夫.英语教育新论:多元目标英语课程[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2015.
[30]郭剑晶.法律英语教材评价实践[J].外语教学理论与实践,2013(4):41-44.
[31]贾蕃.中国外语教材评估研究30年(1990—2020)[J].当代外语研究,2022(1):83-92.
[32]刘国生.法律英语课程设置和教学模式研究[J].西南政法大学学报,2012(1):130-135.
[33]刘艳芳,洪流.浅析判例在刑法适用中的地位和作用[J].法律适用,1999(8):7-9.
[34]麦克·F.D.扬.知识与控制[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,2002.
[35]秦丽莉,姜伟,王永亮.基于生态给养理论的外语教材评估框架构建——以课程思政元素的多模态内容为例[J].外语界,2023(6):23-31.
[36]汤斌.个体化理论与“专门性”原则的互补性——以编码取向的形成为例[J].外语教学,2015(6):19-23.
[37]王申.我国法律职业伦理建构的德性要义[J].政治与法律,2023(4):84-96.
[38]文秋芳.“产出导向法”教学材料使用与评价理论框架[J].中国外语教育,2017(2):17-23.
[39]武建国,陈琪.合法化语码理论:诠释与瞻望[J].现代外语,2022(4):575-585.
[40]习近平.高举中国特色社会主义伟大旗帜为全面建设社会主义现代化国家而团结奋斗——在中国共产党第二十次全国代表大会上的报告[M].北京:人民出版社,2022.
[41]杨帆.法律英语教学内容的范式革新——以培养涉外法治人才为目标[J].法学教育研究,2021(4):56-70.
[42]杨敏,侍怡君.基于文化与功能视角的英语教材评价框架构建[J].当代外语研究,2020(3):57-67.
[43]张法连.涉外法治专业人才培养需要厘清的几个问题[J].新文科教育研究,2021(4):5-15.
[44]张法连,张建科.法律英语学科发展规划研究[J].中国ESP研究,2013(1):36-43;89.
[45]张伟年.英语教材评价理论框架研究[J].外语研究,2014(1):67-73.
[46]赵勇,郑树棠.几个国外英语教材评估体系的理论分析——兼谈对中国大学英语教材评估的启示[J].外语教学,2006(3):39-45.
[47]中国政法大学法律英语教学与测试研究中心课题组.大学法律英语教学大纲[S].北京:外语教学与研究出版社,2014.
[48]中国政法大学法律英语教学与测试研究中心课题组.法律英语专业教学大纲[S].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2020.
[49]朱永生.合法化语码理论对Bernstein知识结构理论的传承与创新[J].中国外语,2014(6):10-13.
[50]庄智象.构建具有中国特色的外语教材编写和评价体系[J].外语界,2006(6):49-56.
(2)https://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2019-02/25/content_5368422.htm，访问日期：2024-04-09。
(3)http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A26/jcj_kcjcgh/201404/t20140408_167226.html，访问日期：2024-04-09。
基本信息:
DOI：10.13564/j.cnki.issn.1672-9382.2024.03.010
中图分类号:H319.3;D90-055
引用信息:
[1]杨敏,王晶.基于合法化语码理论视角的法律英语教材评价框架研究[J].中国外语,2024,21(03):77-86.DOI:10.13564/j.cnki.issn.1672-9382.2024.03.010.
基金信息:
中国人民大学重大项目“法律话语的身份建构”（编号：20XNL016）的阶段性研究成果