nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg searchdiv qikanlogo popupnotification paper
2017 06 v.14;No.80 53-61
动态系统论视角下跨洋互动写作课程学生英语作文的复杂度、准确度和流利度研究
基金项目(Foundation): 国家社会科学基金项目“中美二语写作的差异与共性化问题探析”(14BYY080);; 吉林大学本科教学改革研究项目“中美协作学术写作混合式教学模式研究(2017XYB116);; 吉林省高等教育教学改革研究课题“大学英语写作课程体系建设与教学模式探索”(吉教高201771号)的部分成果
邮箱(Email):
DOI: 10.13564/j.cnki.issn.1672-9382.2017.06.009
中文作者单位:

吉林大学;太原理工大学;新西兰奥克兰大学;

摘要(Abstract):

本实证研究基于"跨洋互动在线英语写作"课程,以动态系统论为指导,考察中国学生英语作文的语言特征。受试为选修该课程的8名中国学生,运用了Wolfe-Quintero et al.(1998)所总结的方法考察学生作文语言的复杂度、准确度和流利度。总体测试结果表明学生作文写作流利度和复杂度普遍提高,但准确度却普遍下降。每个学生作文的语言复杂度、准确度和流利度的发展趋势呈现不同的特点。学生作文的成绩以流利度和准确度的贡献权重最大。在跨洋互动教学过程中,我们应该积极引导学生调整对语言准确度的关注,达到语言复杂度、准确度和流利度的均衡发展。

关键词(KeyWords): 跨洋互动英语写作;;动态系统论;;复杂度;;准确度;;流利度
参考文献

[1]Ai,H.&X.Lu.A web-based system for automatic measurement of lexical complexity[P].Paper presented at the 27th Annual Symposium of the Computer-Assisted Language Consortium(CALICO-10).Amherst,MA.June 8-12,2010.

[2]Angelova,M&Y.Zhao.Using an online collaborative project between American and Chinese students to develop ESL teaching skills,crosscultural awareness and language skills[J].Computer Assisted Language Learning,2016,29(1):167-185.

[3]Chen,J.J.&S.C.Yang.Fostering foreign language learning through technology-enhanced intercultural projects[J].Language Learning&Technology,2014,18(1):57-75.

[4]De Bot, K. ,W. M. Lowie & M.H.Verspoor.A dynamic systems theory approach to second language Acquisition [J]. Bilingualism:Language and Cognition,2007,10(1):7-21.

[5]Ellis, R. The Study of Second Language Acquisition(2nd ed)[M].Oxford:Oxford University Press,2008.

[6]Ellis,R.The differential Effects of three types of task planning on the fluency,complexity and accuracy in L2 oral production[J].Applied Linguistics,2009,30(4):474-509.

[7]Ellis,R.&F.Yuan.The effects of planning on fluency,complexity and accuracy in second language narrative writing[J].Studies in Second Language Acquisition,2004,26(1):59-84.

[8]Faigley,L.Names in search of a concept: Maturity, fluency,complexity,and growth in written syntax[J].College Composition and Communication,1980,31(3):291-300.

[9]Furstenberg, G., S. Levet, K.English&K.Maillet.Giving a virtual voice to the silence language culture:The CULTURA Project[J].Language Learning&Technology,2001,5(1):55-102.

[10]Harmmerly, H. Fluency and Accuracy: Toward Balance in Language Teaching and Learning[M].Clevedon:Multilingual Matters,1991.

[11]Hester,J.L.Investigating writing fluency in seventh and eighth graders’narrative and expository first drafts[A].In C.Levy&S.Ransdell(eds).The Science of Writing[C].Mahwah,NJ:Erlbaum,2001:39-57.

[12]Kormos,J.Task complexity and linguistic and discourse features of narrative writing performance[J].Journal of Second Language Writing,2011,20(2):148-161.

[13]Housen,A.&F.Kuiken.Complexity,accuracy,and fluency in second language acquisition[J].Applied Linguistics,2009,30(4):461-473.

[14]Hunt,K.W.Recent measures in syntactic development[J].Elementary English,1966,43(7):732-739.

[15]Kessler,G.Collaborative language learning in co-constructed participatory culture[J].CALICO Journal,2013,30(3):307-322.

[16]Larsen-Freeman,D.Chaos/complexity science and second language acquisition[J].Applied Linguistics,1997,18(2):141-165.

[17]Larsen-Freeman, D. Language acquisition and language use form a chaos/complexity theory perspective[A].In Kramsch,M.(ed).Language Acquisition and Language Socialization:Ecological Perspectives[C].2002:33-46.

[18]Larsen-Freeman,D.The emergence of complexity,fluency,and accuracy in the oral and written production of five Chinese learners of English[J].Applied Linguistics,2006,27(4):590-619.

[19]Larsen-Freeman,D&L.Cameron.Complex Systems and Applied Linguistics[M].Oxford:Oxford University Press,2008.

[20]Larsen-Freeman, D.Adjusting expectations:the study of complexity,accuracy,and fluency in second language acquisition[J].Applied Linguistics,2009,30(4):579-589.

[21]Laufer,B.&P.Nation.Vocabulary size and use:Lexical richness in L2 written production[J].Applied Linguistics,1995(16):307-322.

[22]Lee,L.&A,Markey.A study of learners’ perceptions of online intercultural exchange through Web 2.0 technologies.Re CALL,2014(26):281-297.

[23]Liao,M.L.&R.J.Johnson.E-mail writing as a cross-cultural learning experience[J].System,2001(29):235-251.

[24]Little,D.G.,E.Ushiooda,M.C.Appel,J.Moran,B.O’Rourke,&K.Schwienehorst.Evaluating tandem language learning by email:Report on a bilateral project[J].CLCSOccasional Papers,1999:55.

[25]Lu,X.The relationship of lexical richness to the quality of ESL learners’oral narratives[J].The Modern Language Journal,2012,96(2):190-208.

[26]Müller-Hartmann,A.Learning how to teach intercultural communicative competence via telecollaboration:Amodel for language teacher education[A].In J.A.Belz&S.Thorne(eds).Internet-mediated intercultural foreign language education[P].Boston:Heinle&Heinle,2006:63-84.

[27]O’Dowd,R.Understanding the“other side”:Intercultural learning in a Spanish-English e-mail exchange[J].Language Learning&Technology,2003,7(2),118-144.

[28]O’Dowd,R.Evaluating the outcomes of online intercultural exchange[J].ELT,2007,61(2),144-152.

[29]Ong,J.&L.J.Zhang.Effects of task complexity on the fluency and lexical complexity in EFL students’argumentative writing[J].Journal of Second Language Writing,2010,19(4):218-233.

[30]Ong,J.&L.J.Zhang.Effects of the manipulation of cognitive processes on EFL writers’text quality[J].TESOL Quarterly,2013,47(2):375-398.

[31]Robinson, P. Task complexity,cognitive resources,and syllabus design:A triadic framework for examining task influences on SLA[C].In P.Robinson(ed).Cognition and Second Language Instruction[C].Cambridge,UK:Cambridge University Press,2001:287-318.

[32]Robinson,P.Task complexity,theory of mind,and intentional reasoning:Effects on L2 speech production,interaction,uptake and perceptions of task difficulty[J].IRAL-International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching,2007,45(3):193-213.

[33]Robinson,P.,T.Cadierno&Y.Shirai.Time and motion:Measuring the effects of the conceptual demands of tasks on second language speech production[J].Applied Linguistics,2009,30(4):533-554.

[34]Rosmawati. Second language developmental Dynamics:How dynamic systems theory accounts for issues in second language learning[J].The Australian Educational and Developmental Psychologist,2013,31(1):66-80.

[35]Skehan,P.A Cognitive Approach to Language Learning[M].Oxford:Oxford University Press,1998.

[36]Skehan, P., Modelling second language performance:integrating complexity,accuracy fluency,and lexis[J].Applied Linguistics,2009,30(4):510-532.

[37]Spodark, E. Integrating online techniques into undergraduate French language instruction[J].The French Review,2001,74(6),1206-1217.

[38]Strasma, K. & G. Foster.Collaboration within writing classes:an ethnographic point of view[J].The Writing Instructor,Spring/summer,1992:111-127.

[39]van Gelder,T.&R.Port.It’s about time:An overview of the dynamical approach to cognition[A].In R.Port&T.van Gelder(eds).Mind as Motion:Exploration in the Dynamics of Cognition[C].Cambridge,MA:MIT Press,1995.

[40]Verspoor,M.,W.Lowie&M.van Dijk.Variability in second language development from a dynamic systems perspective[J].The Modern Language Journal,2008,92(2):214-231.

[41]Ware,P.“Missed”communication in online communication:Tensions in a German-American telecollaboration.Language Learning&Technology,2005,9(2):64-89.

[42]Williams,J.&J.Evans.‘What kind of focus and on which forms?’[A].In Doighty,C.&J.Williams(eds).Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition[C].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1998.

[43]Wolfe-Quinter,K.,S.Inagaki&H.-Y.Kim.Second Language Development in Writing:Measures of Fluency,Accuracy, and Complexity [M].Honolulu:University of Hawaii Press,1998.

[44]Zhang,L.J.2013.Second language writing as and for second language learning [J]. Journal of Second Language Writing,2013,22(4):446-447.

[45]Zhang,L.J.&D.Zhang.Thinking metacognitively about metacognition in second and foreign language learning,teaching,and research:Toward a dynamic metacognitive systems perspective[J].Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies,2013,396(12):346-361.

[46]陈锦.基于最近发展区的纠正性反馈与语言复杂度、准确度和流利度[D].硕士学位论文,广东外语外贸大学,2015.

[47]戴运财,王同顺.基于动态系统理论的二语习得模式研究--环境、学习者与语言的互动[J].山东外语教学,2012(5):36-42.

[48]何旭良.句酷批改网英语作文评分的信度和效度研究[J].现代教育技术,2013(5):64-67.

[49]李晔.大学英语课堂里的意义协商与输出优化[J].东北师大学报(哲学社会科学版),2016(3):131-135.

[50]陆小飞,许琪.二语句法复杂度分析器及其在二语写作研究中的应用[J].外语教学与研究,2016(3):409-420.

[51]王初明.论外语学习的语境[J].外语教学与研究,2007(3):190-197.

[52]王初明.互动协同与外语教学[J].外语教学与研究,2010(4):297-299.

[53]王初明.哪类练习促进外语学习[J].当代外语研究,2013(2):28-31.

[54]邢加新,罗少茜.任务复杂度对中国英语学习者语言产出影响的元分析研究[J].现代外语,2016(4):528-538.

[55]袁玉琳.任务复杂度对二语口语产出流利度、复杂度、准确度的影响[D].硕士学位论文,重庆大学硕士学位论文,2012.

[56]郑咏滟.二语心理词库的动态系统发展与频率效应[J].解放军外国语学院学报,2015(5):82-90.

基本信息:

DOI:10.13564/j.cnki.issn.1672-9382.2017.06.009

中图分类号:H319.3

引用信息:

[1]许春燕,张军,战菊.动态系统论视角下跨洋互动写作课程学生英语作文的复杂度、准确度和流利度研究[J].中国外语,2017,14(06):53-61.DOI:10.13564/j.cnki.issn.1672-9382.2017.06.009.

基金信息:

国家社会科学基金项目“中美二语写作的差异与共性化问题探析”(14BYY080);; 吉林大学本科教学改革研究项目“中美协作学术写作混合式教学模式研究(2017XYB116);; 吉林省高等教育教学改革研究课题“大学英语写作课程体系建设与教学模式探索”(吉教高201771号)的部分成果

检 索 高级检索

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文