| 3,162 | 57 | 12 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
本文从生态批评架构的视角分析《变革我们的世界:2030年可持续发展议程》。研究发现:"可持续发展"架构是对"发展"架构的修改,"公平"架构移位于"持续增长"架构;深层架构涉及人与自然和谐相处、和平、对话与国际合作,但仍未完全跳出人与自然主客二分和狭隘民族主义的拘囿;架构背后的故事肯定了自然的工具价值,却否认了自然的内在价值。鉴于此,我们提出基于"生命共同体"的生态思想创建新架构,讲述中国生态故事,为全球生态发展贡献中国智慧。
Abstract：This paper analyzes Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development from the critical framing perspective.Research findings are as follows: Sustainability frame is the modification of development frame, and equality frame is displaced by sustainable growth frame; deep frames involve harmony between man and nature, peace, dialogue and international cooperation but are still limited to the dichotomy between man and nature and narrow nationalism; Stories embedded in the frames recognize worth of nature as tools but deny its intrinsic value. In the light of the Life Community thought, we tend to create new frames and tell Chinese ecological stories, offering Chinese wisdom for the global ecological development.
[1]Alexander,R.J.Framing Discourse on the Environment:A Critical Discourse Approach[M].New York:Routledge,2009.
[2]Berman,T.The rape of mother nature?Women in the language of environmental discourse[A].In Fill,A.&Mühlh?usler,P.The Ecolinguistics Reader:Language,Ecology and Environment[C].London and New York:Continuum,2001:258-269.
[3]Berry,T.The Dream of the Earth[M].San Francisco:Sierra Club Books,1988.
[4]Bringhurst,R.The Tree of Meaning:Language,Mind and Ecology[M].Berkley:Counterpoint,2006.
[5]Chilton,P.Missing links in mainstream CDA:Modules,blends and the critical instinct[A].A New Agenda in Discourse Analysis Theory:Methodology and Interdisciplinarity[C].Amersterdam/Philadelphia:John Benjamins Publishing Company,2005:19-51.
[6]Croft,W.&Cruse,A.Cognitive Linguistics[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2004.
[7]Jacobs,G.&Goatly,A.The treatment of ecological issues in ELT coursebooks[J].ELTJournal,2000,54(3):256-264.
[8]Johnson,M.Metaphorical reasoning[J].Southern Journal of Philosophy,1983,21(3):371-89.
[9]Lakoff,G.Why it matters how we frame the environment[J].Environmental Communication:A Journal of Nature and Culture,2010,4(1):70-81.
[10]Larson,B.Metaphors for Environmental Sustainability:Redefining Our Relationship with Nature[M].New Haven and London:Yale University Press,2011.
[11]Palmer,G.Cognitive linguistics investigations across languages,fields and philosophical boundaries[A].When Does Cognitive Linguistics Become Cultural?[C].Amsterdam/Philadelphia:John Benjamins Publishing Company,2006:13-46.
[12]Semino,E.Metaphorin Discourse[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2008.
[13]Steen,G.J.,Dorst,A.G.,Herrmann,J.B.,Kaal,A.A.,Krennmayr,T.&Pasma,T.A Method for Linguistic Metaphor Identification:From MIPto MIPVU[M].Amsterdam/Philadelphia:John Benjamins,2010.
[14]Steffensen,S.V.&Fill,A.Ecolinguistics:The state of the art and future horizons[J].Language Sciences,2014,41:6-25.
[15]Stibbe,A.Animals Erased:Discourse,Ecology and Reconnection with the Natural World[M].Middleton:Wesleyan University Press,2012.
[16]Stibbe,A.Ecolinguistics:Language,Ecology and the Stories We Live By[M].London and New York:Routledge,2015.
[17]Martin,J.Politics and Rhetoric:ACritical Introduction[M].London and New York:Routledge,2014.
[18]何伟，耿芳.英汉环境保护公益广告话语之生态性对比分析[J].外语电化教学,2018(8):57-63.
[19]黄国文.从生态批评话语分析到和谐话语分析[J].中国外语,2018(4):39-46.
[20]人民网-人民日报.习近平出席第二十三届圣彼得堡国际经济论坛全会并致辞[OL].http://politics.people.com.cn/n1/2019/0608/c1024-31125361.html,2019-06-08.
[21]王馥芳.生态语言学和认知语言学的相互借鉴[J].中国外语,2017(5):47-55.
[22]汪少华,张薇.美国政治话语的隐喻架构模式建构研究--以布什和奥巴马的环保演讲为例[J].中国外语,2017(2):54-59.
[23]汪少华,张薇.“后真相”时代话语研究的新路径：批评架构分析[J].外语教学,2018(4):29-34.
[24]王寅.认知生态语言学初探[J].中国外语,2018(3):22-30.
[25]辛志英，黄国文.系统功能语言学与生态话语分析[J].外语教学,2013(3):7-10+31.
[26]赵蕊华.系统功能视角下生态话语分析的多层面模式--以生态报告中银无须鳕身份构建为例[J].中国外语,2016(5):84-91.
[27]中共中央文献研究室.习近平关于社会主义生态文明建设论述摘编[M].北京:中央文献出版社,2017.
[28]朱长河.认知生态语言学--体验哲学视野下的语言研究新范式[J].外国语文,2015(5):59-64.
(1)United Nations. Transforming Our World:The2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.https://sustainable development.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld/publication,2015.
基本信息:
DOI：10.13564/j.cnki.issn.1672-9382.2019.05.009
中图分类号:H315
引用信息:
[1]汪少华,纪燕.生态话语的批评架构分析——以《变革我们的世界：2030年可持续发展议程》为例[J].中国外语,2019,16(05):59-67.DOI:10.13564/j.cnki.issn.1672-9382.2019.05.009.
基金信息: