| 1,599 | 2 | 652 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
建设性新闻指注重解决社会问题、挖掘事件积极意义的报道。本文基于和谐话语分析，借鉴系统功能语言学和认知语言学理论，构建多模态和谐架构分析框架，以《人民日报》地震新闻为语料，探讨建设性新闻的话语特征。研究发现，新闻使用速报和方案架构最多，和平和恢复性叙事架构次之，预期架构最少。这些表层架构激活的深层架构包括“多元和谐、交互共生”的生态哲学观和可持续发展的生态价值观，遵循以人为本的假定和良知、亲近、制约原则。新闻呈现出语域与多模态资源的复杂性，实现了报道事件、提高公众良知、鼓舞人心的多重目的，展现了话语在构建和谐社会中的积极作用。
Abstract：Constructive news refers to reporting that focuses on solving social problems and exploring the positive significance of events. Based on harmonious discourse analysis and the ories of systemic functional linguistics and cognitive linguistics, this paper constructs a multimodal harmonious framing framework for constructive news. It explores the discourse features of constructive news, with Weibo news reports on earthquakes from People's Daily as the corpus. The study finds that among surface frames, frames of news flash and solutions take the largest proportion, and frames of peace and restorative narrative take the second, followed by the prospective frame. These surface frames activate deep frames including the ecological philosophical view of “diverse harmony and interactive symbiosis” and the ecological values of sustainable development. They are consistent with the “people-oriented” assumption and the principles of conscience, proximity, and regulation. The news presents remarkable complexity in register and multimodal resources. In this way,multiple purposes are achieved, including reporting news events, raising public consciousness, and inspiring people, fully demonstrating the positive role of discourse in constructing a harmonious society.
[1] Feng, D. Z. Multimodal Chinese Discourse[M].London&New York:Routledge, 2023.
[2] Gitlin, T. The Whole World Is Watching:Mass Media in the Making and Unmaking of the New Lefi[M]. Berkeley:University of California Press, 1980.
[3] Halliday, M. A. K. Language as Social Semiotic:The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning[M]. London:Edward Arnold, 1978.
[4] H e r m a n s, L.&C. Gyldensted. Elements of constructive journalism:Characteristics,practical application and audience valuation[J].Journalism, 2019(4):535-551.
[5] Kristeva, J. Word, dialogue and novel[A]. In T. Moi(ed). The Kristeva Reader[C]. Oxford:Basil Blackwell, 1986:35-61.
[6] Lakoff, G. Don’t Think of an Elephant! Know Yo u r Va l u e s a n d F r a m e t h e D e b a t e[M].Hartford:Chelsea Green Publishing, 2004.
[7] Lakoff, G. Thinking Points:Communicating Our American Values and Vision:A Progressive’s Handbook[M]. New York:Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2006.
[8] Lakoff, G. Why it matters how we frame the environment[J]. Environmental Communication:A Journal of Nature and Culture, 2010(1):70-81.
[9] Machin, D.&T. van Leeuwen. Sound, music and gender in mobile games[J]. Gender and Multimodality, 2016(3):412-432.
[10] Mast, J., R. Coesemans&M. Temmerman.Constructive journalism:Concepts, practices,and discourses[J]. Journalism, 2019(4):492-503.
[11] Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. Multisemiosis and context-based register typology:Registerial variation in the complementarity of semiotic systems[A]. In E. Ventola&A. J. M. Guijarro(eds). The World Told and the World Shown[C].B a s i n g s t o k e:P a l g r a v e M a c m i l l a n, 2009:11-38.
[12] Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. Register in the round:Registerial cartography[J]. Functional Linguistics, 2015(2):1-48.
[13] McIntyre, K. Solutions journalism:The effects of including solution information in news stories about social problems[J]. Journalism Practice,2019(1):16-34.
[14] McIntyre, K.&C. Gyldensted. Constructive journalism:Applying positive psychology techniques to news production[J]. The Journal of Media Innovations, 2017(2):20-34.
[15] Stibbe, A. An ecolinguistic approach to critical discourse studies[J]. Critical Discourse Studies,2014, 11:117-128.
[16] Stibbe, A. Ecolinguistics:Language, Ecology and the Stories We Live By[M]. London:Routledge,2015.
[17] Zhao, X., M. M. Zhan&B. F. Liu. Understanding motivated publics during disasters:Examining message functions, frames, and styles of social media influentials and followers[J]. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 2019(4):387-399.
[18]党君.重大疫情事件中建设性新闻对于公众情绪的调节与引导[J].当代传播, 2020(4):56-59.
[19]党君,马俊树.重大突发事件中社交媒体建设性新闻的实践效果——基于《人民日报》官方微博对MU5735空难报道的分析[J].现代传播, 2023(2):11-18.
[20]郭毅.建设性新闻:概念溯源、学理反思与中西对话[J].现代传播, 2020(1):72-77.
[21]何伟,高然,刘佳欢.生态话语分析新发展研究[M].北京:清华大学出版社, 2021.
[22]何伟,魏榕.多元和谐,交互共生——国际生态话语分析之生态哲学观建构[J].外语学刊,2018(6):28-35.
[23]黄国文.外语教学与研究的生态化取向[J].中国外语, 2016(5):1; 9-13.
[24]黄国文.论生态话语和行为分析的假定和原则[J].外语教学与研究, 2017(6):880-889.
[25]黄国文.从生态批评话语分析到和谐话语分析[J].中国外语, 2018(4):39-46.
[26]黄国文,赵蕊华.什么是生态语言学[M].上海:上海外语教育出版社, 2019.
[27]刘婵君,沈玥晨.共识兼顾与集体取向:中国主流媒体建设性新闻实践——关于人民日报微博官方账号新冠肺炎疫情报道的分析[J].新闻与传播研究, 2022(4):21-37; 126.
[28]刘明.语料库辅助的中国生态形象建构研究[J].现代外语, 2023(1):83-96.
[29]马俊杰.生态语言学研究中的“认知范式”[J].外国语言文学, 2018(5):472-481.
[30]苗兴伟,李珂.主体间性视角下生态身份的话语建构[J].英语研究, 2022(2):154-165.
[31]史安斌,王沛楠.建设性新闻:历史溯源、理念演进与全球实践[J].新闻记者, 2019(9):32-39; 82.
[32]汪少华,纪燕.生态话语的批评架构分析——以《变革我们的世界:2030年可持续发展议程》为例[J].中国外语, 2019(5):59-67.
[33]汪少华,张薇.“后真相”时代话语研究的新路径:批评架构分析[J].外语教学, 2018(4):29-34.
[34]王馥芳.生态语言学和认知语言学的相互借鉴[J].中国外语, 2017(5):47-55.
[35]王寅.认知生态语言学初探[J].中国外语,2018(3):22-30.
[36]武建国,徐嘉.互文性策略与中国国家形象建构研究——以港珠澳大桥新闻报道为例[J].中国外语, 2021(6):45-50.
[37]武建国,颜璐.微博语篇中的互文性——基于《人民日报》新浪微博的研究[J].外语教学,2015(6):1-4; 43.
[38]徐燕,冯德正.多模态公共卫生教育话语研究:语域类型学视角[J].浙江外国语学院学报,2020a(2):11-21.
[39]徐燕,冯德正.新媒体商务话语中的多模态体裁互文:语域类型学视角[J].外语教学,2020b(3):23-28.
[40]袁红梅,汪少华.框架理论研究的发展趋势和前景展望[J].西安外国语大学学报, 2017(4):18-22; 66.
[41]赵蕊华,黄国文.和谐话语分析框架及其应用[J].外语教学与研究, 2021(1):42-53; 159-160.
[42]郑家栋.自然和谐与差等秩序[J].中国哲学史,2003(1):11-12.
[43]周文娟.中国语境下生态语言学研究的理念与实践——黄国文生态语言学研究述评[J].西安外国语大学学报, 2017(3):24-28.
[44]朱长河.认知生态语言学——体验哲学视野下的语言研究新范式[J].外国语文, 2015(5):59-64.
基本信息:
DOI：10.13564/j.cnki.issn.1672-9382.2024.03.005
中图分类号:G212
引用信息:
[1]陈淑君,魏在江.建设性新闻的多模态和谐架构研究——以《人民日报》对灾难性事件的报道为例[J].中国外语,2024,21(03):27-38.DOI:10.13564/j.cnki.issn.1672-9382.2024.03.005.
基金信息:
教育部人文社科研究项目“中国式现代化对外话语的多模态认知研究”（编号：23YJC740003）的阶段性成果