| 2,407 | 1 | 349 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
能动性是学习者二语学习成就的决定性因素，但学界对教材使用情境下学习者能动性的探讨有限。本研究采用质性个案研究方法，运用复杂动态系统理论探究了外语教材使用情境下学习者能动性的促生过程，对访谈、课堂录像、叙事、实物资料等多种来源数据进行分析，发现外语教材使用情境下学习者能动性系统是由个体系统、教学系统及社会文化系统构成的复杂嵌套系统，具有情境性及个体性特征。能动性的促生是系统要素变化产生扰动作用，经由初始态不断调适的自适应过程。本研究最后提出外语教材使用情境下学习者能动性涌现模型，揭示了系统要素间的相互作用机制，对教材使用研究及能动性研究具有一定的启示。
Abstract：Agency is the decisive factor for learners' achievement, but there is yet very limited research on agency in the context of textbook use. This case study explores the emergent process of learner agency in the context of textbook use from the perspective of complex dynamic systems theory.Analysis of multiple sources of data reveals that in the context of textbook use learner agency system is composed of embedded sub-systems including individual systems, instructional systems, and sociocultural systems. This leaner agency system has the characteristics of situational sensitivity and individuality. The emergence of learner agency is the result of perturbations caused by changes in system elements and an adaptive process of continuous adjustment from an initial state. Finally, this study proposes a model for the emergence of learner agency in the context of textbook use, aiming to reveal the mechanisms of interaction between systems. This study provides valuable insights into future textbook research and agency study.
[1] Ahearn, L. Language and agency[J]. Annual Review of Anthropology, 2001, 30:109-137.
[2] Capra, F.&P. L. Luisi. The Systems View of Life[M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 2014.
[3] Eirbayer, M.&A. Mische. What is agency?[J].American Journal of Sociology,1998(4):962-1023.
[4] Gao, X. Strategic Language Learning:The Role of Agency and Context[M]. Bristol:Multilingual Matters, 2010.
[5] Guerrettaz, A. M., M. Grandon, S. Lee, C.Mathieu, A. Berwick, A. Murray&M. Pourhaji.Material use and development:Synergetic processes and research prospects[J]. Filio,2018(2):37-44.
[6] Johnson, K. Digital technology as a tool to support children and educators as co-learner[J].Global Studies of Childhood, 2019(4):1-12.
[7] Larsen-Freeman, D. Chaos/complexity science and second language acquisition[J]. Applied Linguistics, 1997, 18:141-165.
[8] LLarsen-Freeman, D. Complex, dynamic systems:A new transdisciplinary theme for applied linguistics[J]. Language Teaching,2012, 45:202-214.
[9] Larsen-Freeman, D. On language learner agency:A complex dynamic system theory perspective[J]. The Modern language Journal,2019, 103:61-79.
[10] Larsen-Freeman, D.&L. Cameron. Research methodology on language development from a complex systems perspective[J]. The Modern Language Journal, 2008, 92:200-213.
[11] Mercer, S. Understanding learner agency as a complex dynamic system[J]. System, 2011, 39:427-436.
[12] Netto, G., M. Hudson, N. Kamenou-Aigbekaen&F. Sosenko. Dominant language acquisition in destination countries:Structure, age, and reflexivity[J]. Sociology, 2019(5):843-860.
[13] Pavlenko, A.&J. Lantolf. Second language learning as participation and the(re)construction of selves[A]. In J. Lantolf(ed). Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning[C]. New York:Oxford University Press, 2000:271-291.
[14] Said, F.&H. Zhu.“No, no Maama! Say ‘Shaatir ya Ouledee Shaatir’” children’s agency in language use and socialization[J]. International Journal of Bilingualism, 2017(3):771-785.
[15] Teng, F. Autonomy, Agency and Identity in Teaching and Learning English as a Foreign Language[M]. Singapore:Springer, 2019.
[16] Ushioda, E. Motivation, autonomy and sociocultural theory[A]. In P. Benson(ed).Learner Autonomy 8:Teacher and Learner Perspectives[C]. Authentik:Dublin, 2007:5-24.
[17] van Lier, L. Agency in the classroom[A]. In J.Lantolf&M. Poehner(eds). Sociocultural Theory and the Teaching of Second Languages[C].London:Equinox, 2008:163-186.
[18] Vaughn, M. Making sense of student agency in the early grades[J]. Phi Delta Kappan, 2018, 7:62-66.
[19]杜小双.高中英语教师学习的复杂动态系统研究[D].北京外国语大学, 2022.
[20]郭燕,徐锦芬.我国大学英语教材使用情况调查研究[J].外语学刊, 2013(6):102-108.
[21]李琛,杨鲁新.社会文化理论视角下学术英语读写课中的学习者能动性个案研究[J].现代外语, 2022(3):394-405.
[22]刘传江,焦培慧.基于隐喻分析的ESP教材使用体验研究[J].外语教育研究前沿, 2021(4):70-76.
[23]秦丽莉.社会文化视阈下英语学习者能动性与身份之间的关系[J].外语教学, 2015(1):60-64.
[24]秦丽莉,姜文凯,韩悦.信息技术背景下学习者能动性可视化研究（1991—2019）[J].外国语文, 2021(2):117-125.
[25]秦丽莉,徐锦芬.教育技术融合环境下高校外语学习者能动性概念模型构建与应用路径探索[J].中国外语, 2024(1):83-91.
[26]徐锦芬,刘文波.外语教材使用：分析框架与研究主题[J].现代外语, 2023(1):132-142.
[27]苏芳,李琛,侯俊霞.语言社会化视域下外语专业教材的接受行为研究[J].现代外语,2023(4):514-526.
[28]曾家延,崔允漷.学生使用教科书研究：教材研究的新取向[J].课程·教材·教法,2019(11):67-74.
[29]郑咏滟.动态系统理论在二语习得研究中的应用——以二语词汇发展研究为例[J].现代外语, 2011(3):303-309; 330.
基本信息:
DOI：10.13564/j.cnki.issn.1672-9382.2024.03.006
中图分类号:H319.3
引用信息:
[1]苏芳,杨鲁新.外语教材使用情境下学习者能动性个案研究——复杂动态系统理论视角[J].中国外语,2024,21(03):69-76.DOI:10.13564/j.cnki.issn.1672-9382.2024.03.006.
基金信息:
国家大中小学外语教材建设重点研究基地（北京外国语大学）项目“全球外语教材与资源建设：多维视角下大中小学外语教材研究”（编号：2022SYLZD014）; 上海外国语大学外语教材研究项目“西部高校大学生新形态外语教材使用中的学习者能动性研究”（编号：2023T001）; 陕西省教育科学“十四五”规划课题（编号：SGH23Y2333）的阶段性研究成果